🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Expensive

Based on recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare that with what average American pays. I know dozens of clients who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like many federal defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and less expensive approach for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.